Gardens of the Written Word: Popular Literature with Plants and Flowers in Their Title

From food to fashion, flowers have been prevalent in every aspect of culture and man-made creations, and literature is no exception.

flowers-in-literature-book-with-flowersPlants and flowers in literature:

“Flowers for Algernon,” Daniel Keyes

This classic American fictional short story follows the progress of Charlie, a man with a low IQ who undergoes an experimental surgery that turns him into a genius. The effects of the surgery are short-lived, yet the story he tells is one that will live on forever.

Continue reading Gardens of the Written Word: Popular Literature with Plants and Flowers in Their Title

Flower Photography in High-Def: An Interview With Filmmaker and Photographer Andrew Zuckerman

Peony Cultivar
Image courtesy of Andrew Zuckerman

Here at Petal Talk, we live and breathe flowers in their every form. Whether we’re discovering new ways to decorate with fresh blossoms, creating our own DIY flowers or spotting our favorite blooms in works of art, flowers are what make us smile. So you can imagine the excitement we felt when we came across the newly released book Flower by filmmaker and photographer Andrew Zuckerman. His mesmerizing high-definition images capture flowers in all their glory, creating a vibrant bouquet of photographs that will take your breath away. We were so fascinated by Zuckerman’s flower photography that we just had to reach out to him personally and learn more about his inspiration. Here, Zuckerman himself gives us a behind-the-scenes look at how he brought his latest project to full bloom.

Throughout your career, you’ve photographed a variety of subjects: legendary artists, politicians, business and religious leaders, as well as birds and other wild animals. Why did you choose flowers as your most recent subject?

My interest in flowers was twofold, really. For one thing, since I began exploring the natural world with Creature, I found myself wanting to create a kind of collection of two-dimensional taxonomy, which I equate most immediately with turn of the century naturalist drawings. Flower was the next step in this process. In addition, I like to work with self-imposed constraints and I tend to be inspired by subjects that have been exhausted. Since flowers are one of the oldest subjects in art (their appearance dates back to ancient Egypt), they presented a unique challenge. I was really interested in divorcing the flowers from all their symbolic and metaphorical associations, as well as their ecological contexts, in order to reveal their essential qualities.

In your book Flower, you show intimate close-ups of 150 flower species. How many flower species did you shoot in total while working on the book? How did you select the final 150 images?

I shot around 250 species in total, all of which are included on the project’s microsite, FlowerTheBook.com. I like to be pretty comprehensive once I start investigating a subject, and I work across a few platforms to create more points of entry into the work. So the projects will include films, a website, taxonomical index, and of course the book, which I consider as an object, so how all the images work together and flow from page to page is important. I usually start with my favorite images and go from there, making sure every image makes sense as part of the larger whole.

Peony Cultivar
Photo courtesy of Andrew Zuckerman

The bright colors of your flowers set against a sharp white background give your photos a surreal effect, putting an intense focus on the flowers themselves and nothing else. Why do you shoot your photos this way?

I find this reductive approach suits both my taxonomical impulses and my desire to reveal the essence of a subject.

Many of the exotic flower species you shot for your book aren’t the kinds of flowers you see every day. How did you collect them for your photo shoots?

We were very fortunate to have the support of amazing institutions like the New York Botanical Garden, the Smithsonian Institute, and Fairchild Tropical Garden. But I wanted the project to be a broad survey of the botanical world, so you’ll find a lot of New York City deli flowers mixed in with the incredibly rare orchids and tropicals.

Working at 1-800-Flowers, we know how delicate flowers are and how carefully they need to be handled. What would you say was the most difficult thing about working with such a perishable item?

I was actually surprised by how resilient they were! We work with very hot lights at the studio (and on location), and I expected the process to be much more delicate than it was. But we also handled them with care. We had coolers and water on hand, and we benefitted from working closely with the horticulturalists at many of the institutions.

What was your favorite flower to shoot for this project?

Darwin's Star Orchid
Image courtesy of Andrew Zuckerman

Even though it’s not the most visually striking, I found the Darwin’s Star orchid, named for its role in the formulation of Darwin’s theory of evolution, the most fascinating. The bloom has an 11-inch spur, which Darwin posited meant there had to be an insect that existed with an appendage long enough to pollinate it. At the time, none had been discovered and Darwin’s hypothesis was ridiculed. But 40 years later, entomologists discovered a moth with a furled tongue that was four times longer than its body.

What was the most important thing you learned about flowers during this project?

While compiling the taxonomical index for the project, we learned that botanical classifications are in a state of flux since advances in technology have revolutionized the science of classification. So a lot of plants that were grouped according to visual cues are now being re-identified in terms of their biology. I don’t know that it’s the most important thing I learned about flowers, but it was definitely one of the most interesting. I just think about the custodians of the vast botanical world (endless, really; new species are discovered all the time) collecting and reclassifying all the data. That really blew my mind.

Your work is known for being accessible to its audience through multiple points of entry, such as photographs, films, and interactive apps. How did you interlace photography and videography to get up close and personal with flowers?

The reason I do films, as well as make photographs, books and websites is because I believe no one medium is best suited to conveying a concept. In the case of Flower, I knew that I wanted to capture the peak, heroic moment in the photographs, but I also wanted to explore the life cycles and rhythms of the flowers, which is so inherent to our emotional response to them. The films allowed me to do that.

In this film, you show the life and death of flowers, along with music that is synchronized with their life cycle. Stunning! How did you go about making this film, and what was the artistic goal you wanted to achieve with it?

The goal, which is always one of the goals, was to render the subject in the most precise way possible. So instead of using video footage, the films were created from thousands of high-definition stills, which were taken every minute or so on a time delay setting. I was very lucky to collaborate with Jesse Carmichael of Maroon 5, who composed the scores, and I love that the music seems like such a natural extension of the visual aims.

What advice would you give to budding flower photographers?

It’s not flower photographer-specific, but I would pass on the advice Chuck Close gave me when I was interviewing him for the Wisdom project: “Inspiration is for amateurs. The rest of us just show up and get to work.” I think this is one of the most important things for anyone pursuing a creative life to bear in mind.

If you loved Flower, you’ll also enjoy Zuckerman’s other work: Bird, Creature, Music and Wisdom. Visit AndrewZuckerman.com to browse through his entire collection of photos and films.

A Flower in Your Hair from Billie Holiday to Effie Trinket

People have been wearing flowers in their hair since… well, perhaps since Eve spotted the first fig blossom and tucked it behind her ear.  It’s probably the oldest form of adornment in the world, and it’s a custom that’s found around the world too.  Asia, Polynesia, Europe, India—all over the world and for many centuries women, and for special occasions men too, have worn flowers in their hair.

A Flower in Your Hair!

You’ve seen the photograph from the recent hit movie The Hunger Games of Elizabeth Banks as Effie Trinket, the District 12 escort, sporting a huge fuchsia silk flower in her pink wig. Effie’s character is a woman who values the niceties of life and is following in a long tradition of wearing a flower in your hair.

Tang Dynasty ladies are pictured in ancient Chinese scrolls with peonies in their bouffant hair-dos. Nineteenth-century Tahitian women, as we know from Gaugin’s paintings, favored a tropical bloom behind an ear. Hawaiians opt for plumeria or frangipani. Indian women weave falls of fragrant jasmine into their braids.

But these lush living flowers are a far cry from Effie Trinket’s big fake flower. As it happens, fake flowers, in one form or another, have been around for centuries too—since biblical times, in fact. The Queen of Sheba challenged Solomon to find the real lily amid the false, and his solution to the riddle underlines one problem with using real flowers in your hair. As King Solomon so wisely observed, real flowers can attract bees.

In Japan, geishas and other women who wear traditional dress on a regular basis fix hana kanzashi in their hair. These flowers are made from tiny squares of silk, folded again and again, like origami, and then cut into petals that are attached to a backing and turned into bouquets. The month dictates what kind of kanzashi a geisha wears: cherry blossoms in April, wisteria in May, chrysanthemums in October—while the flowers are silk, they are also seasonal.

In Europe, though village May queens might have worn wreaths of wild roses and daisies, well-to-do women didn’t really begin to wear flowers until the 18th century, when they joined the array of adornments favored by the French court. Early in the century, when hairstyles were smaller and closer to the head, a couple of rosebuds, real or artificial, might be arranged with a cluster of tidy curls. But as the century progressed and hair got bigger—up to two feet tall, and held in place with pomade and powder—more decorations were required. A couple of roses became a garland, and a string of pearls became a full-rigged miniature ship. When real flowers were used, vials of water were tucked into the massive construction to keep the blooms alive, but Europe had talented craftspeople creating artificial blooms also.

In the nineteenth century, the elaborate hair styles and headdresses gave way to natural hair, parted in the middle and decorated with floral falls—generally made of artificial flowers and ribbons attached to a band, so the effect was demure and ladylike. Queen Victoria opted for a wreath of flowers for her wedding, rather than, say, the crown jewels or a tiara—and brides have been wearing wreaths ever since, as have their flower girls.

For a while flowers migrated from hair to hats, but jazz singer Billie Holiday helped bring the fashion back. She became famous for the white gardenias she wore over her left ear, a style born of necessity one night when she badly singed her hair with a curling iron. She was as likely to sport a cluster of artificial flowers as she was real gardenias.

Flowers in Art: Sargent’s “Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose”

Two little girls stand in a garden at dusk, intently lighting the candles in Chinese lanterns; lilies tower over them. Everything glows in this painting: the white dresses on the girls, the girls’ faces, the lanterns—and the lilies.

This is Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose, one of John Singer Sargent’s most beloved works. The title comes from a popular song in England of the 1880s, when the artist spent two summers working on the painting.

A garden scene might seem like an unlikely subject for a man best known for his portraits of Gilded Age society figures, portraits that now hang in museums from San Francisco to London, as well as in ducal mansions in Britain. (Though a closer looks reveals many flowers in those portraits, tucked into hats and hair and corsages and nosegays, so obviously he got plenty of practice.)

But in 1884, Sargent was struggling to find a place in the art world. His now famous painting Madame X (Madame Pierre Gautreau) had been savaged by the Paris art critics, and the young man, born in America and reared in Europe, found few commissions. He closed his Paris studio and began working in London, hoping for greater success there—but British critics were equally harsh. (Interestingly enough, one complained bitterly about the “crudity of the carnations” in an 1884 portrait.) However, he had a number of friends, and in 1885 he joined a colony of artists—painters and writers—summering in the Cotswolds, in a village about a dozen miles from Stratford: Novelist Henry James was one of their number, as was poet and art critic Edmund Grosse; so was portraitist Frank David Millet and illustrator Frederick Barnard and his wife, Alice Faraday Barnard, and their two daughters. It was a happy group by all accounts.

Sargent spent the summer dashing off oil sketches of everything he saw, painting in a very nearly Impressionist style. One of those sketches was of two children in a garden, standing among towering lilies. Sargent revisited the idea the following summer, replacing the boy and girl in the preliminary study with the two Barnard girls, Dorothy and Polly, who were seven and eleven at the time.

Regardless of the delicacy and freshness of the painting, the final work was anything but dashed off. Sargent did study after study for it, and then toiled away on the painting itself for two successive summers. He had only a few minutes at dusk each day when the light was exactly right, so his time was extremely limited. The scene was carefully set, and as the magic moment neared, his subjects would take their places and he would paint feverishly. As summer became fall in 1885, the roses withered and were replaced by wax ones wired to the bare shrubs, and paper lilies stood in for real ones. Finally, in November, the work had to be set aside for another season.

He finished Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose in the summer of 1886. The painting proved a turning point in his career. London art critics who had scorned his work praised Carnation, Lily when it was exhibited in 1887 at the Royal Academy; it was purchased almost immediately for the Tate Gallery in London, where it hangs to this day. Within five years Sargent was the leading portraitist of his day, painting lords and ladies, industrialists and presidents. But every summer he abandoned the studio and headed for the outdoors, where his subjects were family and friends and the natural world. Among those lifelong friends were Alice Faraday Barnard and her daughters (Frederick Barnard died tragically in a fire in 1896), and the family often accompanied him on painting vacations.

Exit mobile version